Pidgin 2.1 UI Ideas (with mockups!)
steven.w.j.brown at gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 13:04:00 EDT 2007
Hylke Bons wrote:
> I like your ideas.
> The "extended pane" looks a lot like my mockup, but how does it look
> when there is no avatar or a smaller one (different protocols).
> Personally I would switch the status message and username. The toggle
> button you mentioned sounds reasonable for people who like their pane
If there is no avatar, I think a generic one should be put in its place.
There should always be something, unless the user has specified not to
display them. If it's a user, a generic person graphic. If it's an IRC
channel, maybe the chat-bubble graphic... and the infopane could be used
to display the channel topic (clickable and selectable, of course!),
like in xchat-gnome.
If the avatar is smaller, then it should either be centred within the
available space, or stretched to fit it. I'm not sure what the min/max
sizes on protocol icons are, so I'm not sure what the worst-case
stretching would be. But I think the vertical space will eventually be
needed by many protocols anyway.
The button could be a gtk expander (arrow thing that rotates), but all 3
states would be nice: full infopane, small infopane, no infopane.
Including the expander on the infopane and the current "Show Buddy
Details" toggle preference could work, or the preference could be
changed to a drop-down with the 3 options.
> I think this protocol button could really work! The "Send To" entry in
> the menu bar always looked a little weird to me. But be aware that a
> grouped contact can contain more then one contact with the same protocol.
Me too! I only just discovered how it worked too! hah. :P As long as
the dropdown contains the protocol username, I don't see this being a
More information about the Devel